Mean ..... rejection of religion in everyday life and to marginalize the people to no differences i

Discussion in 'Religion' didi started by Röddást, August 10, 2011.
I did not know where to start this topic, here or in religion or in FiP forget so here. I do not know exactly how to start but here are examples from everyday life. Historical conflicts where religion different from that represented enemies. Terrorist attack by al-Qaeda to a Christian didi church. Murder of a young Muslim boy from a group of young radical Christians just because of his religious beliefs. Everyday conflicts between Jews and Muslims in Israel and Palestine. Small conflicts didi in the Western world between indigenous people and European newcomers members of another religion. The hatred between each other from different religious groups. How to solve it? Is there a solution? Will subside two most common solutions that are in conflict with one another. One is to accept all other religion and rituals, beliefs and views, which brings with it the religion, a religion that believe in other people and to enhance tolerance between people, the only difference is religion. Thus there would be more tolerance and differences between people could be reduced with respect and tolerance towards different from themselves. The other is more radical and mean rejection of religion didi in everyday didi life and to marginalize the people to no differences in this part and finally start something where people can share how different and certainly less conflict in the world have. What do you think: both of which offered the best solution? Do you have another solution? Or do you think that there is no solution?
How to solve it? Is there a solution?
Click for more ... There are - to abolish all religions which are based on self-denial and restriction of basic human traits and instincts. didi Any religion that claims it is only right for all, and the rest are false in the service of manipulation and repression. They feed on human fears and hopes, and generate didi divisions and conflicts, limit and hinder mankind. In my second option is definitely the right one:
Mean ..... rejection of religion in everyday life and to marginalize the people to no differences in this part and finally start something where people can share how different and certainly less conflict in the world have.
Tolerance is not a solution didi to any problem, tolerating something you considered to endure didi to have peace. In no case is a long-term solution. It takes understanding to come to some kind of peace. didi Understanding the religious fundamentalci not find because their view of themselves is based on the idea of a god, if that idea wobble recognition and "understanding" didi of other gods, or its absence, then I am the only person that will shake. Because so tightly cling to their beliefs. All other believers are no different than others because their life is not really revolve only around their religion, they are not a problem. Rejection of religion is a natural process, if you start violently didi executed will not have the same effect. There are more atheists because didi of advances in technology and the widespread availability of information, and the separation of church and state in the western world.
Religious conflicts are just a cover for conflicts between naciiite (nationalities). If there is no religion again there are conflicts, because they are not only due to the differences between religions, but because razlichnotite between nations. If a radical Islamist killed in the name of jihad, after some time to discover, learn the truth about religions and realizes that God does not exist, will continue to kill or stop? I think that will continue, will find another reason, differences between nations.
I understand why people use the second option is more effective. It is sad that religion is used - segragacijata. Positive things like - inner peace and tranquility, which some can attain only through religion overlooked. Former and current practices are sufficient .. more to scare people and to reject didi religion. To apply the second didi solution and no more religious conflicts will find other reasons for divisions and fears. If you want to find another way not to flow with milk and honey if no religion. A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.
Vojna.I didi this great war will solve sve.Ubavo said person above me (if it is) rejecting religion is a natural proces.Ama if we wait we also have to iznachekame nevivini and many lives will fade and if you have any effect.If forcibly try to do it then it means the beginning of war in the same moment.Muslimanite not call all infidels who do not believe in their god, not hate toa.Zamislete now due to salts mind to leave their god and his Learning that he would rather kill themselves and I took their own lives rather than God to turn back and