Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Inside infidels is not necessarily bad. But


Some of you think that's unlikely, there are other people, who also have "faith" that, and pointed out that no sociological research on this issue. This makes me have some thoughts:
People go to church regularly temple to practice ethical practices that better people, karmaloop then of course it is likely that many more good people, and more reliable, than the "grazing" not practicing century karmaloop What the law.
Very vulnerable to grazing ghost devil take the road gave way. For example, hang out on the street, which was drooping go drink beer, karaoke, after several round is going to fall into worse ones. The possibility is very high because fallen man is social animal herding, like others, I too, have a problem where?
Inside "religious" because of not sinning against his conscience by Lord Buddha or Allah guarded heart daily and social pressures and disciplined lifestyle. Those who go to church or temple they have a faith community are responsible for each other, and they are living discipline every week.
Inside infidels is not necessarily bad. But'm not one to "test" conscience often and not sure if "mechanisms" community pressure as the "religion". Many people do not usually directed at the American bar. Many are not directed at alcohol karmaloop Vietnam karmaloop often take dog meat, money and other things to do "reason for living". Nobody conscience keepers inside and out, then there is something karmaloop not dare to do?
Religious parties can still say follow certain political trends and distort their opinions go. But if you do a control experiment, other factors being equal, I think the more credible religious people have no religion at all. I do not need to prove who asked her to take the data and put literature. This is based on his review of normal karmaloop logic.
A person's ability to speak 7 part 3 part lie and say it's different from one person to tell the truth and say 7 part 3 part lie. A liar but regretted faith-based objective is supported by other communities with a lie that believes that it is telling the truth according to their subjective.
In front of me on TV at home watching a female diplomat said Vietnam and the U.S. are not paradise ... implies two countries alike! How can this be the same? A party at the ultra wealthy and suffering other side with a lot of people into poverty and even phèo.
Inside no religion nor no limit but the limit can not with certainty and is also quite limited relative karmaloop who's that this man, drawing himself up to his own limits. Overall I felt pretty ... floating. :-)
Faith always implicit in which a certain moral code. Code of ethics similar to the fence to limit the extent of human sin. That does not mean "fence" of all so-called "faith" is the same.
If a person can not take the religious order of the people living there are religious barriers do it just because they draw themselves. Barriers that do not have the support of Lord Buddha in their hearts to take in and not have the encouragement and pressure from unions like the religious people. Knots is that the law itself has its own style isolated subjective. Loneliness and self-painted fence law is likely to be low and high ability is broke.
If a certain religious people themselves, karmaloop apart from knowing karmaloop what they are doing, there is their relationship with the Lord Buddha and the community of faith who have encouraged and pressure in an objective standard. Hence their lifestyle and discipline karmaloop more accountable. karmaloop Hence their ability to respect the fence and did not dare break the rules above.
For example, the Islamic month of fasting, regular prayer practice. Party people meditating Buddhist, living ashrams. Inside the Catholic weekly churchgoers, and read the Bible and do good deeds for society.
In Vietnam, the vast majority of the religious left and took the citizenship education policy as "religious" or tuyech empty slogans. The result is agitated society, most people have a personal moral code to live the type of subjective and screwed.
My first question when I read something that someone is behind the article? What is this organization? Those types of individuals who are leaders? Sometimes a newspaper only a little bit of information leaders, as well give up on Google and search karmaloop out interesting information block.
Benefits of this group is what? They are interested in something? Why did they post this information? They are what? The relationship between these groups is how the information? Groups of colluding with groups? Standing behind him was a fierce anti-communist, a vehemently pro-communist him, a monk or a trade?
Recently China protests and has some objections facebook page, they have lofty topics but do not be so foolish as not to know who participated behind? That can be a particular interest group, it may be a group turbidity fat c

No comments:

Post a Comment